← Search

Jeffrey Carmody

Madison, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 56W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Carmody to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stan Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with JD Hosemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stan Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Howell, Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Owen Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-01 · Howell, Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Owen Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Howell, Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Owen Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Eaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Stubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lane Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conner Fudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-02 · Walker, Niven · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 53.1% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.1% of games
4.0
60%
15W–10L · 56% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.2% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 62% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe