← Search

Conner Fudge

Brandon, MS
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 30W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Conner Fudge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Youngblood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-07 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Stubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-17 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-24 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niven Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-10 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-07 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niven Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-09-24 · Nguyen, Tam · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rehan Ali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-18 · Custode, Hector · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joseph M Jabour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-09-17 · Nguyen, Tam · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taurean Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-09-04 · Custode, Hector · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Isaac Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.3% of games
4.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 60.6% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 62.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal