← Search

Elaine Heekin

Glenmont, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 79W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elaine Heekin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judith Carnavos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Aurelle Rath / Alison Rutter
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Arilee Bagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Aurelle Rath / Alison Rutter
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Ronsvalle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Aurelle Rath / Alison Rutter
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Ronsvalle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Aurelle Rath / Alison Rutter
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Arilee Bagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Teresa Rim / Susan Lee
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Arilee Bagley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · Northern: TriLevel 4.0 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arilee Bagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-24 · Northern: TriLevel 4.0 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arilee Bagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-12-06 · TriLevel 4.5 4.0 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-3
W
2025-11-15 · TriLevel 4.5 4.0 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · TriLevel 4.5 4.0 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 89.6% of games
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
4.5
68.4%
26W–12L · 60.1% of games
8.0
76.7%
23W–7L · 66% of games
9.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova