← Search

Neerja Bhatnagar

Penfield, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 114W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Neerja Bhatnagar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Carol Ryan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Zsuzsa Price / Elizabeth Anderson
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Meghan Moore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · I got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Crossed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Napier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · I got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Meghan Moore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 54.7% of games
3.5
79.4%
27W–7L · 58.7% of games
4.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 41.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
62.5%
25W–15L · 55.1% of games
8.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 67% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#3 Female Doubles
8%
14 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe