← Search

Erin Crowe

Saratoga Springs, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 78W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erin Crowe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Richter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Grajny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · Richter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Nolte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Richter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hindson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hindson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Ann Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ericka Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ericka Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-16 · SRYMCA - 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Zogby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-15 · Perfect Match · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · SRYMCA - 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Zogby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.0
80%
24W–6L · 63.2% of games
3.5
77.1%
27W–8L · 63.1% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer