← Search

Stephen Radachi

— year-end
83 matches · 59W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephen Radachi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Matthew Debiec / Edward Raffel
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akin Fashina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lion Moeliono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tolva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Douglas Vahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · X18 8.0 LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelley Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lion Moeliono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tolva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-15 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Horwich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · X18 8.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth van Dyke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lion Moeliono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tolva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 63.8% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 56.3% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.7% of games
8.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 56.9% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe