← Search

Atara SImpson

Long Beach, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 169W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Atara SImpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Julie Barnola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Abby Castellano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Dora Wu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jennifer Sweet / Yelena Reporyeva
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Kathy Rey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Carole Allers / Erin Murphy
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Kathy Rey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Arnone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · HIT/PW, Newell/Imberman · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · LI: Point Set, Thomas/Simpson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Gottlieb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · LI: Point Set, Thomas/Simpson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.8% of games
3.5
81.4%
48W–11L · 65.5% of games
4.0
55.6%
40W–32L · 50.9% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
75.8%
25W–8L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
47 matches
#2 Singles
10%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer