← Search

Edmund Corvelli

Glen Rock, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 44W–13L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Edmund Corvelli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Ryan Belmonte championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jacek Cieszynski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jaewook Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jaewook Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Siva Kakaraparthi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siva Kakaraparthi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Markman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Urvish Barot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-06 · No Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-29 · No Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Eng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 65.2% of games
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 59.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert