← Search

Matt Picardi

— year-end
27 matches · 5W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matt Picardi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-09-10 · OTD Spartans · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Akker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · OTD Spartans · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louis Pierro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · OTD Spartans · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Akker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · Stoffer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with George Werle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Northern: Time Stand Still · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Northern: Hanleys Heroes · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Northern: Time Stand Still · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Akker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Northern: Hanleys Heroes · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Stoffer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chad Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Northern: Time Stand Still · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · Northern: Hanleys Heroes · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nixon de Tarnowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-19 · Hanleys Heroes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 35.2% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 41% of games
9.0
0%
0W–10L · 30.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams