← Search

J R Cagle

COLLIERVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 20W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add J R Cagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Catie Carter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-10-05 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Rasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Matt Lund / Jeanine Dyer
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Suzy Bowman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-26 · Brown/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catie Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-28 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Henry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-11 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Longsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-02 · Arbelaez/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-04-29 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-16 · Arbelaez/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-04-12 · Lewis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Lee Mesaris / Greg Thompson
2025-04-08 · Butorac/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Keith Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-05 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 63.7% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 47.7% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#1 Singles
12%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova