← Search

Catie Carter

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 52W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Catie Carter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Johnston Tayloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Tayloe/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Glasgow/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Gleysteen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Philips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Cooper/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bin Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Darby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lil Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Carr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Burbank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Courtney Smith / Elizabeth Lewis
2026-06-15 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Rice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 56.7% of games
4.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
12W–0L · 71.2% of games
4.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 58.7% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert