← Search

Betsy Ferguson

Collierville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 36W–52L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Betsy Ferguson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Hervey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Hervey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · Pelt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Heinkel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Pelt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Strelsin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · Pelt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucas Skinner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catie Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Saab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmen Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catie Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.5% of games
4.5
21.7%
5W–18L · 32.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.9% of games
8.5
20%
2W–8L · 38.3% of games
4.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer