← Search

Caren Wasta

Cedar Rapids, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 37W–45L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Caren Wasta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Goins/Wasta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Patten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Patten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Faye Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Corbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · Cobb & Trovas: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Thinnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-04 · Patten/Wasta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Patten mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-12-07 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Netolicky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-07 · Hurn/Sherman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Trovas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-23 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carole Harder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-10-24 · Patten/Wasta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Wasta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 53.5% of games
7.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–15L · 21.6% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert