← Search

Matt Skelly

Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 109W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matt Skelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Rigney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Soltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · He.Remley18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · He.Remley18M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tanya Parise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · He.Remley18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · TOC.Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · TOC.Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · TOC.Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Fadool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · TOC.Brown · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brennan Doran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
80.4%
41W–10L · 60.3% of games
5.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.2% of games
8.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55% of games
9.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 58.3% of games
10.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.1% of games
4.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova