← Search

Pedro Loaiza

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 91W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pedro Loaiza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Be.Barnhill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ben Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matt Skelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Be.Barnhill40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Fuhrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Be.Barnhill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Zietlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
David Hill / Ben Thompson
2026-08-12 · Be.Barnhill40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edward Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · Mi.Ratliff18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samir Naik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Be.Barnhill40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Fuhrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-02 · Ga.Jimenez18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Simon Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Ga.Jimenez18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Gowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Ga.Jimenez18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Gowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Be.Barnhill40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlos Collado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
49%
48W–50L · 50.3% of games
7.5
42.9%
24W–32L · 48.5% of games
8.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 41% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
32 matches
#1 Singles
14%
27 matches
#2 Singles
12%
24 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova