← Search

Mark Scherr

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 146W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Scherr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
W
Matthew Anderson / Abraham Post
2026-09-12 · TCarroll.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Parv Mital
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Perian · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Parv Mital
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3
W
2026-08-29 · TCarroll.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Parv Mital
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-23 · Ma.Gregson18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Dare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · TOC.Gregson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason High
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · Ma.Gregson18C8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Parv Mital
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Llewellyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Berliner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-01 · TCarroll.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-30 · TOC.Llewellyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · TOC.Llewellyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Berliner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · HRoss-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Scherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
Everett Tate / Vineeth Malneedi
2026-07-12 · Ch.Whitehorne18T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Whitehorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 56.7% of games
4.0
70.4%
50W–21L · 57.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 54.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
84.6%
22W–4L · 62.6% of games
8.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 54.7% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe