← Search

Dana Hood

RUTLAND, VT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 30W–18L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Dana Hood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2025-08-26 · Hanleys Heroes · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenneth Ritzenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-05 · Hanleys Heroes · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Enzien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-22 · Hanleys Heroes · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Picardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-08 · Hanleys Heroes · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-15 · Hanley · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-08-06 · Hanley · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-18 · Hanley · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Enzien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-09 · Hanley · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2023-08-02 · Chin 18+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Varun Gandhi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-07-20 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-07-19 · Chin 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Galliher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2023-07-12 · Chin 18+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin O'Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 58.8% of games
8.0
40%
4W–6L · 50.5% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams