← Search

James Galliher

SCHENECTADY, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 46W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Galliher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-03-08 · Northern: Smith 4.0 Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-30 · Tacos After · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-10 · Chin 4.0 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-09 · Tacos After · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Enrique Girard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-02 · Tacos After · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Wentworth-Ping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-21 · Chin 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Albaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-18 · Tacos After · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Service
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-14 · Chin 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-22 · Chin 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-03-08 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ellen Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2024-12-27 · Chin 4.5 TriLevel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srikanth Inuganty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-12-08 · Chin 4.5 TriLevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajesh Padmanabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 60.1% of games
4.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 69% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe