← Search

Janell Kallenbach

Norwalk, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 32W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Janell Kallenbach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
Jennifer Smith / Emma Katubig
2026-06-25 · Goode & Bradfield: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · Goode & Bradfield: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-30 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renea Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leanna White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-31 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-21 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renea Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-01-18 · Hagan: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.9% of games
4.0
50%
14W–14L · 50% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova