← Search

Ashley Mooney

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 153W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ashley Mooney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
L
2026-08-04 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Manley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Szymanski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Etheridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Mooney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elena Haviland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dae-Hee Kwak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Etheridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
11W–0L · 75% of games
3.5
80%
44W–11L · 65.3% of games
4.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 59.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
7.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.9% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#1 Singles
14%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams