← Search

Molly Lipham

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 88W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Molly Lipham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Manley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dorran Dihle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Nicholas Antony / Elizabeth Chiquelin
2026-07-10 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug Biske mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha LaPointe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · MONY-Morgan 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha LaPointe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry St Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pohl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pohl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 66.5% of games
4.0
54%
34W–29L · 50.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 24.8% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 35.5% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.8% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games
8.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova