← Search

Tricia Boushka

— year-end
135 matches · 52W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tricia Boushka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Schulze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Flattery-Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Delane Cohen / Anne Miller
2026-03-09 · Suzanne, Shapland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · Shapland, Suzanne · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-02 · Suzanne, Shapland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Flattery-Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Shapland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Suzanne, Shapland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Vaught
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Shapland, Suzanne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-16 · Suzanne, Shapland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Jacelone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Shapland, Suzanne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.5%
35W–21L · 55.3% of games
4.0
16.7%
11W–55L · 39.9% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal