← Search

Janet Palmer

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 45W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Palmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-11 · CHIP-Palmer 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-17 · CHIP-Palmer 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Rhodes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · CHIP-Guo 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gonjoo Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · CHIP-Guo 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-23 · 1CHIP- Howard 8.0 X 55&0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-02 · 1CHIP- Howard 8.0 X 55&0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Theriot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · 1CHIP- Howard 8.0 X 55&0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-19 · 1CHIP- Howard 8.0 X 55&0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-18 · 1CHIP-PALMER 80MIX 18&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Cuff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-10 · 1RCAA-SHAW sing-hard dubs-clay 40NW TH 40&O SEM F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 54.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 30.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King