← Search

Beth Perez

Center Valley, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 51W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Perez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-03-22 · Saucon Valley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shashin Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Mike Kelly / Shelley Berger
2026-03-21 · Saucon Valley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shashin Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · Tennis Fanatics · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Jennifer Nelson / Laura Sommers
2026-02-15 · Tennis Fanatics · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Kunsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · Saucon Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Sacks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Saucon Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Walter Keiper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · TZ Level Up · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krystle Chuong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-01 · TZ Level Up · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5, 0-1
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Pernia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Keleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Pernia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim England
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 55.8% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
68.6%
24W–11L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams