← Search

Teresa Metcalfe

Fairport, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 58W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teresa Metcalfe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
Annette Welles / Ling Zhang
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie SheakGreen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Kristi Seaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-28 · I got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Eisenman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Challengers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Pierce-Morey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Challengers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Mahar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · I got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · Western: Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Rupright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Western: Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Western: Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen LaRocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.8% of games
4.0
49.1%
26W–27L · 52.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.8% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert