← Search

James Oakes

Springboro, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 52W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Oakes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-06-07 · SRTC-Heintzleman · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steven Heyne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Tom Cecil / Jeremy O'neill
2026-03-08 · SRTC-Garofoli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Kinnunen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-08 · SRTC Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Lofton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Jaspreet Singh
2025-03-02 · SRTC Bailey · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-16 · SRTC Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Garofoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-01-19 · SRTC Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Lofton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-04 · SRTC Garofoli · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-12-15 · SRTC Garofoli · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-17 · SRTC Garofoli · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-11-09 · SRTC Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Lofton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-27 · SRTC Garofoli · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-10-19 · SRTC Garofoli · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Kinnunen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
54%
27W–23L · 52% of games
4.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 40.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 49% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
41 matches
#2 Singles
19%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams