← Search

Tanya Harrington

Lone Tree, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 55W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tanya Harrington to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-07-26 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carter Harrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · SS-LGT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Avery Tilney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Samuelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Stromberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · SS-LGT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Clapham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Carter Harrington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Carter Harrington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · SS-LGT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Samuelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · SS-LGT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · SS-LT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russell Ridings mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
43.2%
19W–25L · 49.8% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.9% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams