Emily Jensik
Arvada, CO
102 matches · 46W–56L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Emily Jensik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history102 matches
L
Meredith Smith / Jamie Steese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
43.8%
28W–36L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 51.5% of games
9.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.