← Search

Michelle Whitson

— year-end
229 matches · 141W–88L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Michelle Whitson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Bleyer (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Brower-Kitchens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · White/Hardebeck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-29 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli McKie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Bleyer (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Wennemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Bleyer (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michelle Millonas / Amy Johnson
2026-03-25 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
W
2026-03-15 · Bleyer (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · Bleyer (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adele Ayres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
62.1%
82W–50L · 55% of games
3.5
60.4%
55W–36L · 54.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova