← Search

Donna Bauman

Chapel Hill, NC
4.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
184 matches · 99W–85L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Donna Bauman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Ch.Higgins40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chunhui Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Ch.Higgins18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-29 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · GSmith-HR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · GSmith-HR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · GSmith-HR · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Brook Holton Sheahan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-21 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Ch.Higgins18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Songkakul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 65.2% of games
4.5
46.2%
36W–42L · 48.6% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
8.5
57.4%
35W–26L · 54.8% of games
9.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.1% of games
4.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#1 Singles
10%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova