← Search

Emily Culbreth

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 147W–111L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Culbreth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-09-09 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Howering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · El.Copeland40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Remley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
Anna Tomkins / Julie Rogers
2026-08-16 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paula Fernandez-Pita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lynne Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · Ch.Burr18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Timinskas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Megan Smith / Caroline Tanner
2026-07-01 · Ch.Burr18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Buyaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Ch.Burr18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miranda Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · Ch.Burr18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Buyaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-14 · Ta.Parise18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Bricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-08 · APlachco40-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.1%
80W–41L · 55.7% of games
4.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 49% of games
7.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 48.1% of games
8.5
55.6%
40W–32L · 53.6% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
66 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams