← Search

Ana Plachco

Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 150W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ana Plachco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
L
Abigail Presson / Jennifer Moore
2026-09-09 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Miranda Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-31 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Petree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Barbara Timinskas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heidi Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Acre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Elder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Carroll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
91.2%
31W–3L · 66.6% of games
4.5
53.8%
50W–43L · 50.1% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.2% of games
8.5
43.8%
32W–41L · 49.8% of games
9.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.8% of games
4.5mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
62 matches
#1 Singles
16%
44 matches
#2 Singles
11%
31 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert