← Search

Stacey Burkert

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
293 matches · 176W–117L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stacey Burkert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history293 matches
W
2026-09-10 · MEasterling18C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-07 · MEasterling18C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aimee Poduri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Boesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · MEasterling.40C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Ingle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-17 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mollie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · MEasterling.40C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Jefferson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Dirschl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · KMcWhorter-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · KMcWhorter-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-20 · #4 Doubles · with Amanda Lacoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Mary Peterson
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games
4.0
64.1%
41W–23L · 57% of games
4.5
47.5%
38W–42L · 48.6% of games
7.5
80%
24W–6L · 61% of games
8.5
74.6%
44W–15L · 59.2% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova