← Search

Berkeley Burbank

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 29W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Berkeley Burbank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bronia Jenkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jess Flanders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Kerley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-11-22 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-17 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Eber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Kerley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Eber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-10-01 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Kerley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.6% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.1% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova