← Search

Caroline Graves

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 28W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Caroline Graves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Tayloe/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Blanche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Berkeley Burbank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Berkeley Burbank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Daniel Forbes / Ava Magness
2026-06-14 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Dent/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Wood-Wiener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Dent/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jess Flanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Elizabeth Carr
2026-04-09 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-25 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Trotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-08-23 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jess Flanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 64.3% of games
4.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.8% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#1 Singles
24%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
16%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King