← Search

Clayton Eber

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 25W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Clayton Eber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Oscar Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Jennifer Carstensen / Daniel Kim
2026-07-22 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabella Florescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Koelsch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabella Florescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophie Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabella Florescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catie Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paxton Ivy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 56.2% of games
4.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 43.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
18 matches
#1 Singles
28%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King