← Search

Dina Vann

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 6W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dina Vann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-11 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ezekeil Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bianca Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ezekeil Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ezekeil Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-18 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwendolyn Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-16 · Lockard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brittany Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-11 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwendolyn Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-02 · Lockard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-03 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-27 · Lockard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Dapremont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-17 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa House-Eley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King