← Search

Natalie Rauscher

— year-end
33 matches · 19W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Rauscher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-08-15 · Wright/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katrina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Ransone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Magee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Ransone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Rauscher/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Grubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Jennifer Wright / Andrea Henry
2026-05-07 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Bringhurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Cutshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jennifer Wright / Claire Fowler
2026-04-29 · Rauscher/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Ransone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Cutshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Wright/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Trumbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer