← Search

Stephanie Dent

— year-end
85 matches · 47W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Dent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Carro/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Kilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-08 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · Tayloe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophie Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Eason/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Battaile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bronia Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Wright / Claire Fowler
2026-07-22 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Emily Brown / Tyler Darby
2026-06-10 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
Emily Brown / Lesley Grubbs
2026-06-01 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Burbank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 57.5% of games
4.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.1% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 55% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer