← Search

Samantha Ransone

— year-end
49 matches · 23W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Samantha Ransone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Samantha Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-29 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Wright/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Fitschen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Neely Leavell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Rauscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelby Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Rauscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 48.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.7% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Singles
20%
10 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King