← Search

Brian Quinn

Tupelo, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 20W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brian Quinn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Lindsey trilevel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randy Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Lindsey trilevel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Benjamin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Summers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tabitha Pitts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-25 · Duncan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Summers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaime Summers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Duncan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Summers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Duncan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethany Bounds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Jamie Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nickolas Bails
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-11 · Jamie Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · 40+ Jamie Lindsey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · 40+ Jamie Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 51% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer