← Search

Joanna Sears

— year-end
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Joanna Sears to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2021-07-20 · Queen City Green · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-06-29 · Queen City Green · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-01 · Queen City Green · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Merri Beth Hebeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-05-18 · Queen City Green · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 2-3
W
Linda Ratterman / Colleen Walroth
2020-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 6-2
W
Melissa Powell / Mary Klekamp
2020-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 4-2
W
2020-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Karen Budd / Linda Ratterman
2020-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2020-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 4-3
L
2020-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 2-0
L
2019-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Merri Beth Hebeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-06-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal