← Search

Cherie Nelson

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Cherie Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2025-05-04 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vildan Meleca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L
2025-03-30 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-23 · New Albany · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Jennifer Murphy / Amanda Spires
2025-02-02 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-12-15 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-11-03 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2023-12-17 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
L
2023-11-12 · New Albany 1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-22 · New Albany 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-10-08 · New Albany 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-5
L
2023-10-01 · New Albany 1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2023-09-17 · New Albany 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 49.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams