← Search

Zoe Dubrow

Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 101W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Zoe Dubrow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
W
2026-08-31 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · Ch.Higgins18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Ch.Higgins18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claire Songkakul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Karen Griffin / Casey Black
2026-07-30 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Barbara Estay / Megan Jones
2026-07-19 · ESpeicher-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsay Castret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · LHabib-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Pa.Mital18M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Carroll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · ESpeicher-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Linke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luc Sanchez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
Casey Black / Karen Griffin
2026-06-29 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luc Sanchez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 38.1% of games
4.5
69.6%
55W–24L · 56.3% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 58.1% of games
9.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.3% of games
4.5mixed
30%
6W–14L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.1% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#1 Singles
18%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova