← Search

Barbara Estay

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 90W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Estay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-11 · SShelby.55C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-03 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · MEvers-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-28 · SShelby.55C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · MEvers-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betsey Duthe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · MEvers-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · SShelby.T-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-03 · SShelby.T-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.1%
53W–31L · 55.4% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
65.5%
36W–19L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal