← Search

Jody Sambrick

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Jody Sambrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-09-13 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Gochnauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Schrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · Manheim - Berkley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Cuskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Manheim - Berkley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melvin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bronkema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Gochnauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve de Perrot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.2% of games
8.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert