← Search

Joe Schrader

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 184W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe Schrader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history303 matches
L
2026-08-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregg Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Jeffrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-28 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jody Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ariff Sumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Opilo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claire Shaak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Hempfield - Scott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Opilo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sydney Nye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Callanan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 56.5% of games
4.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 44.4% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 74.4% of games
7.0
75%
15W–5L · 57.9% of games
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
56W–20L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
48.8%
21W–22L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
124 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
82 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King