← Search

Mckenzie Crawford

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 14W–12L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Mckenzie Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2024-10-19 · SAC-Hummel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bret Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-09-13 · SAC-Hummel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-24 · SAC-Kemple · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-02-03 · SAC-Kemple · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-12-02 · SAC-Hummel · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bret Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-06 · SAC-Hummel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bhaskara Bandi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Natasha Rinard / Lisa Kearns - (DQ)
2023-03-18 · SAC-McConachie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-25 · SAC-McConachie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-02-12 · SAC-McConachie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-02-11 · SAC-McConachie · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-02-05 · SAC-McConachie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-29 · SAC-Marsh/Fernstrom · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane di Vito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2017–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 49.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams