← Search

Cara Fulton

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 157W–152L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cara Fulton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history309 matches
W
2026-09-12 · All Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie Karp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
L
2026-08-16 · All Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · All Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with JoAnn Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Gut Instinct · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chrisanne Gayl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-3
W
2026-06-06 · Gut Instinct · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Weinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
W
2026-06-05 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Whitall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JoAnn Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-0
L
2026-05-31 · Gut Instinct · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie Karp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-08 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Cepko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
58.3%
49W–35L · 56.4% of games
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 48.9% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.9% of games
7.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 66.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.9% of games
3.5mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.7% of games
4.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 34.6% of games
7.0mixed
42.5%
31W–42L · 47% of games
7.5mixed
30%
6W–14L · 41.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
157 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
51 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer