← Search

Masako Murphy

Grasonville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 156W–153L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Masako Murphy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history309 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Worthington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bari Abensohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Mexcur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-23 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hopkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Martin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bari Abensohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-3
W
2026-07-14 · The Vicious Vollies · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Martin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sorina Eftim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Guarino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-01 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Walter Winston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · Martin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sokoloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Worthington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
53.9%
62W–53L · 51.7% of games
4.0
29%
9W–22L · 38.3% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
7.0
65%
39W–21L · 56.1% of games
7.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.6% of games
8.0
39%
16W–25L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
98 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams